Service inquiry • Fixed-scope engagement
Know where your AI workflow sends data—and what you still need to prove.
Independent, source-backed data-boundary reviews of business workflows involving AI providers, models, tools and subprocessors. We distinguish documented facts, customer-reported architecture and unresolved unknowns rather than inventing assurances.
Proposed fixed scope: $1,500
One workflow, up to three external AI providers and five connected tools. We confirm the scope and availability in writing before accepting an engagement or charging.
What the review delivers
- A clear data-flow and provider/tool boundary map based on supplied architecture.
- A dated source and evidence matrix covering provider, route, data category, retention, subprocessors and region where documented.
- Explicit VERIFIED / REPORTED / UNKNOWN classifications.
- Top five prioritized risks or unanswered questions, with owner and validation criteria.
- An independently reviewed executive summary and evidence index.
See what an evidence review looks like
Read a source-backed example comparing public data-handling documentation.
Request a scoped review
Tell us only the high-level business context. Do not include passwords, API keys, protected customer data, private architecture diagrams, or confidential material.
No payment is collected here. We will not claim access to any private system or guarantee compliance. Inquiry does not establish a contract. Contact-data handling.
Boundaries and standards
We use customer-authorized information and verifiable public documentation. This is an operational review, not legal advice, penetration testing, certification or an assertion that public vendor policy proves private runtime behavior. Delivery dates are set only after feasibility and capacity checks.